CVS difference for arm/source/13b.mss
--- arm/source/13b.mss 2005/07/27 00:06:26 1.26
+++ arm/source/13b.mss 2005/07/28 04:44:11 1.27
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
@Part(13, Root="ada.mss")
-@Comment{$Date: 2005/07/27 00:06:26 $}
+@Comment{$Date: 2005/07/28 04:44:11 $}
@Comment{$Source: e:\\cvsroot/ARM/Source/13b.mss,v $}
-@Comment{$Revision: 1.26 $}
+@Comment{$Revision: 1.27 $}
@LabeledClause{The Package System}
@@ -3484,7 +3484,7 @@
of calls to the underlying stream Read and Write operations may differ from
the number determined by the canonical operations. If Ada 95 code somehow
depended on the number of calls to Read or Write, it could fail with an
- Ada 2006 implementation. Such code is likely to be very rare; moreover, such
+ Ada 2005 implementation. Such code is likely to be very rare; moreover, such
code is really wrong, as the permission applies to Ada 95 as well (as it was
a Binding Interpretation).]}
@end{Inconsistent95}
@@ -3500,7 +3500,7 @@
@ChgRef{Version=[2],Kind=[AddedNormal],Ref=[8652/0040],ARef=[AI95-00108-01],ARef=[AI95-00195-01]}
@ChgAdded{Version=[2],Text=[@b<Corrigendum:> Limited types may have default
constructed attributes if all of the parent and (for extensions) extension
- components have available attributes. Ada 2006 adds the notion of
+ components have available attributes. Ada 2005 adds the notion of
availability to patch up some holes in the Corrigendum model.]}
@end{Extend95}
@@ -4332,8 +4332,8 @@
@ChgAdded{Version=[2],Text=[@Defn{incompatibilities with Ada 95}
@b<Corrigendum:> Various freezing rules were added to fix holes in the rules.
Most importantly, implicit calls are now freezing, which make some
- representation clauses illegal in Ada 2006 that were legal (but dubious) in
- Ada 95. Similarly, Ada 2006 says that the primitive subprograms of a specific
+ representation clauses illegal in Ada 2005 that were legal (but dubious) in
+ Ada 95. Similarly, Ada 2005 says that the primitive subprograms of a specific
tagged type are frozen when type is frozen, preventing dubious convention
changes (and address clauses) after the freezing point. In both cases, the
code is dubious and the workaround is easy.]}
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent