CVS difference for arm/source/05.mss

Differences between 1.23 and version 1.24
Log of other versions for file arm/source/05.mss

--- arm/source/05.mss	2004/11/08 04:56:37	1.23
+++ arm/source/05.mss	2005/05/05 00:45:31	1.24
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 @Part(05, Root="ada.mss")
 
-@Comment{$Date: 2004/11/08 04:56:37 $}
+@Comment{$Date: 2005/05/05 00:45:31 $}
 @LabeledSection{Statements}
 
 @Comment{$Source: e:\\cvsroot/ARM/Source/05.mss,v $}
-@Comment{$Revision: 1.23 $}
+@Comment{$Revision: 1.24 $}
 
 @begin{Intro}
 @Redundant[A @nt{statement} defines an action to be performed upon
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
 @end{Example}
 @Chg{Version=[2],New=[where NonLim is a nonlimited type and Lim is a limited
 type. The assignment is legal in Ada 95 (only the first Foo would be considered),
-and is ambiguous in Ada 2005. We make the change because limited expressions
+and is ambiguous in Ada 2006. We make the change because limited expressions
 are now allowed in all other contexts (with a similar incompatibility), and it
 would be odd if assignments had different resolution rules. Moreover, examples
 like this one are rare, as they depend on assigning into overloaded function

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent