CVS difference for arm/source/04a.mss

Differences between 1.41 and version 1.42
Log of other versions for file arm/source/04a.mss

--- arm/source/04a.mss	2004/11/17 01:20:30	1.41
+++ arm/source/04a.mss	2004/11/25 03:12:17	1.42
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 @Part(04, Root="ada.mss")
 
-@Comment{$Date: 2004/11/17 01:20:30 $}
+@Comment{$Date: 2004/11/25 03:12:17 $}
 @LabeledSection{Names and Expressions}
 
 @Comment{$Source: e:\\cvsroot/ARM/Source/04a.mss,v $}
-@Comment{$Revision: 1.41 $}
+@Comment{$Revision: 1.42 $}
 
 @begin{Intro}
 @Redundant[The rules applicable to the different forms of @nt<name> and
@@ -806,7 +806,8 @@
 (or a @nt<range_attribute_reference>) has to be resolved
 without using any context.
 However, in the case of the Access attribute,
-the expected type for the @Chg{New=[@nt{prefix}],Old=[prefix]} has to be a
+the expected type for the @Chg{Version=[2],New=[@nt{attribute_reference}],
+Old=[@Chg{New=[@nt{prefix}],Old=[prefix]}]} has to be a
 single access type, and@Chg{Version=[2],New=[],Old=[ if it is an
 access-to-subprogram type (see @RefSecNum(Operations of Access Types)) then]}
 the resolution of the @nt<name> can use the fact that
@@ -820,7 +821,7 @@
   In the general case, there is no @lquotes@;expected type@rquotes@; for
   the @nt<prefix> of an @nt<attribute_reference>.
   In the special case of 'Access,
-  there is an @Chg{Version=[2],New=[@lquotes@;expected profile@rquotes@; or ],
+  there is an @Chg{Version=[2],New=[@lquotes@;expected type@rquotes@; or ],
   Old=[]}@lquotes@;expected profile@rquotes@; for the @nt<prefix>.
 @end(TheProof)
 @begin(Reason)
@@ -3872,7 +3873,8 @@
 
 @begin{Discussion}
 @ChgRef{Version=[2],Kind=[AddedNormal],ARef=[AI95-00251-01]}
-The entire @LegalityTitle section has been reorganized to eliminate an
+@Chg{Version=[2],New=[The entire @LegalityTitle section has been
+reorganized to eliminate an
 unintentional incompatibility with Ada 83. In rare cases, a type conversion
 between two types related by derivation is not allowed by Ada 95, while it is
 allowed in Ada 83. The reorganization fixes this.
@@ -3880,7 +3882,7 @@
 and reformatted. Because of the limitations of our tools, we had to delete and
 replace nearly the entire section. The text of Ada 95 paragraphs 8 through 12,
 14, 15, 17, 19, and 20 are unchanged; these are now 24.2 through 24.5, 24.11,
-24.12, 24.16, 24.18, and 24.19.
+24.12, 24.16, 24.18, and 24.19.],Old=[]}
 @end{Discussion}
 
 @Leading@ChgRef{Version=[2],Kind=[Deleted],ARef=[AI95-00251-01]}

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent