CVS difference for arm/source/03a.mss

Differences between 1.102 and version 1.103
Log of other versions for file arm/source/03a.mss

--- arm/source/03a.mss	2011/03/11 07:00:36	1.102
+++ arm/source/03a.mss	2011/03/12 08:07:37	1.103
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 @Part(03, Root="ada.mss")
 
-@Comment{$Date: 2011/03/11 07:00:36 $}
+@Comment{$Date: 2011/03/12 08:07:37 $}
 @LabeledSection{Declarations and Types}
 
 @Comment{$Source: e:\\cvsroot/ARM/Source/03a.mss,v $}
-@Comment{$Revision: 1.102 $}
+@Comment{$Revision: 1.103 $}
 
 @begin{Intro}
 This section describes the types in the language and the rules
@@ -1524,7 +1524,7 @@
 @end{DiffWord2005}
 
 
-@LabeledAddedClause{Version=[3],Name=[Subtype Predicates]}
+@LabeledAddedSubClause{Version=[3],Name=[Subtype Predicates]}
 
 @begin{Intro}
 @ChgRef{Version=[3],Kind=[AddedNormal],ARef=[AI05-0153-3]}
@@ -4487,6 +4487,13 @@
 See also the similar permission for Get in
 @RefSecNum{Input-Output for Real Types}.
 @end{Reason}
+
+@ChgRef{Version=[3],Kind=[Added],ARef=[AI05-0182-1]}
+@ChgAdded{Version=[3],Text=[An implementation may extend the Wide_Wide_Value, Wide_Value, and Value
+attributes of a character type to accept strings starting with "Hex_"
+(ignoring case) for graphics characters and those with a code
+position smaller than 16#100#, and three character strings of the form
+"'@i<nongraphic character>'".]}
 @end{ImplPerm}
 
 @begin{Notes}
@@ -4622,6 +4629,16 @@
   of the related types and Width attributes). The vast majority of programs
   won't see any difference, as they are already prepared to handle nongraphic
   characters.]}
+
+  @ChgRef{Version=[3],Kind=[AddedNormal],ARef=[AI05-0182-1]}
+  @ChgAdded{Version=[3],Text=[@b<Correction:>
+  Added an @ImplPermTitle to let Wide_Wide_Value, Wide_Value, and Value accept
+  strings in the form of literals containing non-graphic characters and
+  "Hex_hhhhhhhh" for Latin-1 and graphic characters. These were required to
+  raise Constraint_Error in Ada 2005. Since these attributes aren't very
+  useful, implementations were inconsistent as to whether these were accepted,
+  and code that would care why the attribute failed seems unlikely, this should
+  not be a problem in practice.]}
 @end{Inconsistent2005}
 
 

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent