CVS difference for ais/ai-00253.txt

Differences between 1.3 and version 1.4
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00253.txt

--- ais/ai-00253.txt	2001/05/26 02:55:11	1.3
+++ ais/ai-00253.txt	2001/09/08 01:42:48	1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard C.3.1    (08)                               01-05-20  AI95-00253/02
+!standard C.3.1    (08)                               01-09-07  AI95-00253/03
 !class binding interpretation 00-12-06
 !status ARG approved 8-0-0  01-05-20
 !status work item 00-12-06
@@ -12,12 +12,13 @@
 Pragma Interrupt_Handler is only permitted to name a subprogram declared in
 the protected definition where it appears. Pragma Interrupt_Handler is allowed
-in a single_protected_definition.
+in a single_protected_definition. These restrictions are similar to the
+restrictions on pragma Attach_Handler.
 Why is it that pragma Attach_Handler can only appear in the protected
-definition where the named subprogram is declared (see SNA C.3.1(7)) but
+definition where the named subprogram is declared (see C.3.1(7)) but
 there's no such restriction for pragma Interrupt_Handler (see C.3.1(8))?
 In fact, pragma Interrupt_Handler is permitted to name a protected procedure

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent