CVS difference for ais/ai-00253.txt
--- ais/ai-00253.txt 2001/05/26 02:55:11 1.3
+++ ais/ai-00253.txt 2001/09/08 01:42:48 1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard C.3.1 (08) 01-05-20 AI95-00253/02
+!standard C.3.1 (08) 01-09-07 AI95-00253/03
!class binding interpretation 00-12-06
!status ARG approved 8-0-0 01-05-20
!status work item 00-12-06
@@ -12,12 +12,13 @@
Pragma Interrupt_Handler is only permitted to name a subprogram declared in
the protected definition where it appears. Pragma Interrupt_Handler is allowed
-in a single_protected_definition.
+in a single_protected_definition. These restrictions are similar to the
+restrictions on pragma Attach_Handler.
Why is it that pragma Attach_Handler can only appear in the protected
-definition where the named subprogram is declared (see SNA C.3.1(7)) but
+definition where the named subprogram is declared (see C.3.1(7)) but
there's no such restriction for pragma Interrupt_Handler (see C.3.1(8))?
In fact, pragma Interrupt_Handler is permitted to name a protected procedure
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent