CVS difference for ais/ai-00239.txt

Differences between 1.2 and version 1.3
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00239.txt

--- ais/ai-00239.txt	2000/08/01 05:39:34	1.2
+++ ais/ai-00239.txt	2000/10/05 02:47:30	1.3
@@ -144,8 +144,8 @@
 
 !ACATS test
 
-This problem original came up in ACATS test C392010; this test should have the
-offending cases replaced. In addition, the test in the appendix should be
+This problem originally came up in ACATS test C392010; this test should have
+the offending cases replaced. In addition, the test in the appendix should be
 issued in order to insure that multiple parameter cases and cases where the
 wrong component could be read are also handled. (It is clear that existing
 compilers don't do that.)
@@ -487,9 +487,14 @@
 Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 2:36 AM
 
 Ouch...
-My first reaction is: can't we simply state that the call is illegal, precisely because the types do not match?
-After all, using a default value is equivalent (safe for visibility oddities) to writing the default value explicitely, and as you
-note:
+My first reaction is: can't we simply state that the call is illegal, precisely
+because the types do not match?
+
+After all, using a default value is equivalent (safe for visibility oddities) to
+writing the default value explicitely, and as you note:
+
+> Note that it is impossible to create such a call explicitly, as the type
+> mismatch would make the call illegal.
 
 ****************************************************************
 

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent