CVS difference for ais/ai-00235.txt

Differences between 1.8 and version 1.9
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00235.txt

--- ais/ai-00235.txt	2001/01/23 22:23:30	1.8
+++ ais/ai-00235.txt	2001/09/08 01:42:48	1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 03.10.02  (02)                               00-11-28  AI95-00235/04
+!standard 03.10.02  (02)                               01-09-07  AI95-00235/05
 !class binding interpretation 00-05-31
 !status ARG Approved 8-0-2  00-11-19
 !status work item 00-05-09
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 !qualifier Clarification
 !priority High
 !difficulty Medium
-!subject Resolving 'Access.
+!subject Resolving 'Access
 
 !summary
 
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 
 The easiest course of action would be simply to confirm the RM, and
 require the implementors to conform. However, it is clear that real Ada
-users trip over this rule periodically. It was a large Ada user that
+users trip over this rule periodically. It was a significant Ada user that
 contacted the ACAA with the fact that compilers differ in their implementation
 of this rule, which eventually led to the creation of this AI.
 
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
      if Do_It (Int_Ptr'(Value'Access)) then ... -- OK.
 
 But this is not quite equivalent, because the accessibility rules for anonymous
-access types is different from named access types. (The use of the qualified
+access types are different from named access types. (The use of the qualified
 expression changes the accessibility check for the Access attribute from the
 anonymous type to the named type.) Thus, the user will have to declare
 an access type in the scope of each call, or will have to change to using
@@ -127,7 +127,8 @@
 !ACATS test
 
 ACATS test B3A2016.A, introduced in December 1999, tests this issue.
-A C-test should be created out of the example test circulated in June 2000.
+A C-test should be created out of the example test circulated in June 2000,
+and the commented out cases in B3A2016.A replaced.
 
 !appendix
 
@@ -1804,7 +1805,7 @@
 
 *************************************************************
 
-From: Randy Brukard
+From: Randy Brukardt
 Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 4:45 PM
 
 Pascal wrote:

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent