CVS difference for ais/ai-00205.txt
--- ais/ai-00205.txt 1998/10/12 23:36:44 1.4
+++ ais/ai-00205.txt 1999/06/22 01:44:37 1.5
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-!standard D.4 (10) 98-10-08 AI95-00205/01
+!standard D.4 (10) 99-06-12 AI95-00205/01
!standard D.4 (11)
!class binding interpretation 98-09-29
+!status WG9 approved 99-06-12
!status ARG approved 98-10-08 (6-0-0)
!status work item 98-09-29
!status received 98-09-29
@@ -8,13 +9,13 @@
!difficulty Easy
!subject Priority changes in abortable part
-!summary 98-09-29
+!summary
For the priority queuing policy, if the base priority is changed in an
abortable part while a triggering entry call is queued, the priority of
the entry call is not affected. (That is, the rule of D.4(10) applies.)
-!question 98-10-08
+!question
If Set_Priority is called in the abortable part, is the priority of the
triggering entry call updated? (No.) D.4(10) does not apply (because the
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@
occur (because either D.4(10) or D.4(11) must apply). But there is a
validation test which requires otherwise.
-!response 98-09-29
+!response
The language designers did not want D.4(11) to apply in this case. This
is supported by the use of the phrase "if the task is blocked on an entry
@@ -34,7 +35,7 @@
prevents it from applying in this case as well. The intent was that D.4(10)
would apply to all entry calls unless D.4(11) applied.
-!wording 98-09-29
+!wording
D.4(10) should be changed to read:
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
affect the priority of the call, unless the base priority of the task is
set while the task is blocked on an entry call.
-!appendix 98-09-29
+!appendix
!section D.4(10)
!section D.4(11)
@@ -61,7 +62,7 @@
written. So what happens?
This generated plenty of discussion on the FRT list. The AARM discussion
-of the subject proved decisive - D.4(10) applies.
+of the subject proved decisive - D.4(10) applies.
*************************************************************
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent