CVS difference for ais/ai-00205.txt

Differences between 1.4 and version 1.5
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00205.txt

--- ais/ai-00205.txt	1998/10/12 23:36:44	1.4
+++ ais/ai-00205.txt	1999/06/22 01:44:37	1.5
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-!standard D.4      (10)                               98-10-08  AI95-00205/01
+!standard D.4      (10)                               99-06-12  AI95-00205/01
 !standard D.4      (11)
 !class binding interpretation 98-09-29
+!status WG9 approved 99-06-12
 !status ARG approved 98-10-08 (6-0-0)
 !status work item 98-09-29
 !status received 98-09-29
@@ -8,13 +9,13 @@
 !difficulty Easy
 !subject Priority changes in abortable part
-!summary 98-09-29
 For the priority queuing policy, if the base priority is changed in an
 abortable part while a triggering entry call is queued, the priority of
 the entry call is not affected. (That is, the rule of D.4(10) applies.)
-!question 98-10-08
 If Set_Priority is called in the abortable part, is the priority of the
 triggering entry call updated? (No.)  D.4(10) does not apply (because the
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@
 occur (because either D.4(10) or D.4(11) must apply). But there is a
 validation test which requires otherwise.
-!response 98-09-29
 The language designers did not want D.4(11) to apply in this case. This
 is supported by the use of the phrase "if the task is blocked on an entry
@@ -34,7 +35,7 @@
 prevents it from applying in this case as well. The intent was that D.4(10)
 would apply to all entry calls unless D.4(11) applied.
-!wording 98-09-29
 D.4(10) should be changed to read:
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
 affect the priority of the call, unless the base priority of the task is
 set while the task is blocked on an entry call.
-!appendix 98-09-29
 !section D.4(10)
 !section D.4(11)
@@ -61,7 +62,7 @@
 written. So what happens?
 This generated plenty of discussion on the FRT list. The AARM discussion
-of the subject proved decisive - D.4(10) applies. 
+of the subject proved decisive - D.4(10) applies.

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent