CVS difference for ais/ai-00166.txt

Differences between 1.12 and version 1.13
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00166.txt

--- ais/ai-00166.txt	2000/07/15 02:30:00	1.12
+++ ais/ai-00166.txt	2000/08/01 05:39:34	1.13
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 
 The intent of the International Standard is to allow treatments other
 than parameterless protected procedures as defaults is expressed
-clearly in C.3 (5):
+clearly in C.3(5):
 
   Each interrupt has a default treatment which determines the
   system's response to an occurrence of that interrupt when no
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
 default treatment of an interrupt (or signal) while a program is
 running.
 
-C.3 (29) gives implementation advice as to examples of possible
+C.3(29) gives implementation advice as to examples of possible
 default treatments, but does not limit them:
 
   (1) The default treatment for an interrupt can be to keep the
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@
 
 Moreover, the intent of the standard is to allow user-specified
 handlers that are not parameterless protected procedures, as
-specified in C.3 (26)
+specified in C.3(26)
 
   Other forms of handlers are allowed to be supported, in which
   case, the rules of this subclause should be adhered to.
@@ -108,14 +108,14 @@
 parameter, one with a signal parameter and a context parameter,
 etc.
 
-This is emphasized in C.3.1 (19):
+This is emphasized in C.3.1(19):
 
   Notwithstanding what this subclause says elsewhere, the
   Attach_Handler and Interrupt_Handler pragmas are allowed to be
   used for other, implementation defined, forms of interrupt
   handlers.
 
-and again in C.3.2 (25):
+and again in C.3.2(25):
 
   If implementation-defined forms of interrupt handler
   procedures are supported, such as protected procedures with
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
 previous treatment, without needing to worry about whether the
 previous treatment is a parameterless protected procedure.
 
-This intent is reflected in the first sentence of C.3.2 (16),
+This intent is reflected in the first sentence of C.3.2(16),
 which says Current_Handler returns a value that "represents" the
 attached handler, rather than "designates".  It is unfortunate
 that the word "designates" was inadvertently substituted in the
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
 model.  The standard itself does not explicitly specify how this can be
 determined, but it can be interpreted in a way that may suffice.
 
-C.3.2 (17) does require that the null access value can be
+C.3.2(17) does require that the null access value can be
 used to specify the default treatment for an interrupt:
 
   The Attach_Handler procedure attaches the specified handler

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent