--- ais/ai-00156.txt 1999/08/31 22:53:55 1.4 +++ ais/ai-00156.txt 2000/04/14 01:45:08 1.5 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -!standard G.1.1 (55) 99-08-31 AI95-00156/04 +!standard G.1.1 (55) 00-04-11 AI95-00156/05 !class binding interpretation 96-09-04 !status Corrigendum 2000 99-05-27 !status WG9 approved 98-06-12 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ exponentiation of a complex operand, but not of a pure-imaginary operand, by converting the left operand to a polar representation, exponentiating the modulus by the given exponent, multiplying the - argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a cartesian + argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a Cartesian representation. !question @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ pure-imaginary operand, by converting the left operand to a polar representation, exponentiating the modulus by the given exponent, multiplying the argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a -cartesian representation. Because of this implementation freedom, no +Cartesian representation. Because of this implementation freedom, no accuracy requirement is imposed on complex exponentiation (except for the prescribed results given above, which apply regardless of the implementation method chosen). @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ complex operand, but not of a pure-imaginary operand, by converting the left operand to a polar representation, exponentiating the modulus by the given exponent, multiplying the argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a -cartesian representation." +Cartesian representation." Ken Dritz @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ > exponentiation of a complex operand, but not of a pure-imaginary > operand, by converting the left operand to a polar representation, > exponentiating the modulus by the given exponent, multiplying the - > argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a cartesian + > argument by the given exponent, and reconverting to a Cartesian > representation." Looks good, just a couple nits:

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent