CVS difference for ais/ai-00131.txt

--- ais/ai-00131.txt	1999/02/28 00:53:31	1.7
+++ ais/ai-00131.txt	1999/04/01 22:50:57	1.8
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
-!standard B.3      (69)                               99-02-23  AI95-00131/07
+!standard B.3      (69)                               99-04-01  AI95-00131/08
 !class binding interpretation 98-11-05
+!status ARG Approved (with changes) 8-0-1  99-03-24
 !status work item 98-11-05
 !status work item (revised by Ted Baker) 96-05-05
 !status work item (letter ballot was 10-3-0) 96-10-03
@@ -10,7 +11,7 @@
 !difficulty Hard
 !subject Interface to C -- passing records as parameters of mode 'in'
 
-!summary 99-02-23
+!summary
 
 The Implementation Advice in B.3(69) is correct as written.
 
@@ -19,7 +20,7 @@
 C_Pass_By_Copy-compatible type T should be passed as a t argument to a C
 function, where t is the C struct corresponding to type T.
 
-!question 96-04-17
+!question
 
 B.3(69) says:
 
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@
 above Implementation Advice implies that such an 'in' parameter will
 correspond to a t* on the C side, rather than a t.
 
-!recommendation 98-11-05
+!recommendation
 
 The Implementation Advice in B.3(69) is left unchanged (that is, C-compatible
 records are passed by reference).
@@ -49,10 +50,10 @@
 other words, B.1(13) never applies to convention C_Pass_By_Copy, and there is
 no package named Interfaces.C_Pass_By_Copy.
 
-A type T is eligible for convention C_Pass_By_Copy if and only if T is a
-record type that has no discriminants and that only has components with
-statically constrained subtypes, and each component is C-compatible.  (The
-eligibility rules in B.3(15-18) do not apply to convention C_Pass_By_Copy.)
+A type T is eligible for convention C_Pass_By_Copy if T is a record type that
+has no discriminants and that only has components with statically constrained
+subtypes, and each component is C-compatible.  (The eligibility rules
+in B.3(15-18) do not apply to convention C_Pass_By_Copy.)
 
 If a type is C_Pass_By_Copy-compatible then it is also C-compatible.
 
@@ -70,11 +71,11 @@
 In particular, an implementation may permit other types as C_Pass_By_Copy-
 compatible types (e.g., discriminated records).
 
-!wording 98-11-05
+!wording
 
 See !recommendation.
 
-!discussion 99-02-23
+!discussion
 
 It was a mistake to require pass-by-reference for records passed to C
 functions.  However, at this point, it would be disruptive to change the