!standard D.11(18) 99-09-15 AI95-00111/02 !standard J.7.1(16) !standard J.7.1(20) !class presentation 98-04-27 !status Corrigendum 2000 99-07-28 !status received 98-04-27 !qualifier Presentation !subject Accept body not defined !summary Accept body should be replaced by other wording. !question The term "accept body" is used in D.11(18), J.7.1(16), and J.7.1(20). It is not defined anywhere. !recommendation (See summary.) !wording (See corrigendum.) !discussion This was an editing error; "accept body" was defined in a draft of the standard. !corrigendum D.11(18) @drepl @xinbull, and a entry call is issued to one of the open entries, the corresponding accept body executes. When the rendezvous completes, the active priority of the accepting task is lowered to the held priority (unless it is still inheriting from other sources), and the task does not execute until another Continue.> @dby @xinbull, and an entry call is issued to one of the open entries, the corresponding @fa executes. When the rendezvous completes, the active priority of the accepting task is lowered to the held priority (unless it is still inheriting from other sources), and the task does not execute until another Continue.> !corrigendum J.7.1(16) @drepl Interrupt entry calls may be implemented by having the hardware execute directly the appropriate accept body. Alternatively, the implementation is allowed to provide an internal interrupt handler to simulate the effect of a normal task calling the entry. @dby Interrupt entry calls may be implemented by having the hardware execute directly the appropriate @fa. Alternatively, the implementation is allowed to provide an internal interrupt handler to simulate the effect of a normal task calling the entry. !corrigendum J.7.1(20) @drepl @xindent @dby @xindent executed in response to an interrupt can be executed with the active priority at which the hardware generates the interrupt, taking precedence over lower priority tasks, without a scheduling action.> !ACATS test None needed. !appendix From: Stephane Barbey[SMTP:Stephane.Barbey@di.epfl.ch] Sent: Monday, April 27, 1998 7:58 AM Subject: Accept body !topic Accept body !reference RM95 D.11(18), RM95 J.7.1(16), RM95 J.7.1(20) !from Stéphane Barbey 1998-4-27 <> RM95 D.11(18), RM95 J.7.1(16) and RM95, J.7.1(20) mention the concept of "accept body", which is not defined elsewhere. The ARG should probably rephrase these paragraphs, although I guess that the priority of this item is very low. -Stephane **************************************************************** From: Randy Brukardt, ARG Editor Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 Subject: Typo in this paragraph. Kiyoshi Ishihata points out a typo in this paragraph: "a entry" should be "an entry". I've repaired this in the corrigendum wording. **************************************************************** ****************************************************************