CVS difference for ais/ai-00100.txt

--- ais/ai-00100.txt	2001/01/29 23:33:41	1.3
+++ ais/ai-00100.txt	2004/04/06 19:56:53	1.4
@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
-!standard 04.09    (38)                               01-01-29  AI95-00100/03
+!standard 04.09    (38)                               04-03-23  AI95-00100/04
 !class confirmation 99-03-21
+!status ARG Approved 9-0-0  04-03-05
 !status work item 95-10-21
 !status received 95-10-12
 !priority Low
 !difficulty Medium
-!subject Truncation required for static expressions if Machine_Rounds is
-false.
+!subject Truncation required for static expressions if Machine_Rounds is False
 
-!summary 99-03-21
+!summary
 
 A static expression of a fixed or floating point type that is not part of a
 larger static expression will be rounded or truncated based on the value of
 Machine_Rounds for the type.
 
-!question 99-03-21
+!question
 
 Is the intent of 4.9(38) to require truncation for values of static
 expressions if Machine_Rounds is false? (Yes.)
 
-!response 99-03-21
+!response
 
 Paragraph 4.9(38) reads:
 
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@
 Reading just the first sentence may be confusing, but the second
 sentence makes the intent clear: there are special rounding and truncation
 rules that only apply to static scalar expressions which are not descended
-from a formal scalar type.   To do this correctly will require special
+from a formal scalar type. To do this correctly will require special
 effort, but this effort is required in any case since the legality rules
-require this evaluation to be done without Overflow_Checks.  In other words
+require this evaluation to be done without Overflow_Checks. In other words
 this evaluation in general cannot be done using normal machine arithmetic.
 
-!appendix 95-10-21
+!appendix
 
 !section 4.9(38)
 !subject Truncation required if Machine_Rounds false?