!standard 03.06.02 (02) 99-08-31 AI95-00030/01 !class presentation 95-06-25 !status Corrigendum 2000 99-07-28 !status WG9 approved 96-06-14 !status received 95-06-25 !qualifier Presentation !subject The word "prefix" should be in sans-serif font. !summary The word "prefix" should be in the sans-serif font. !question Shouldn't the word "prefix" should be in the sans-serif font? (Yes.) !recommendation (See summary.) !wording (See summary.) !discussion This was an editing error. !corrigendum 3.06.02(2) @drepl The following attributes are defined for a prefix A that is of an array type (after any implicit dereference), or denotes a constrained array subtype: @dby The following attributes are defined for a @fa A that is of an array type (after any implicit dereference), or denotes a constrained array subtype: !ACATS test None is needed. !appendix !section 3.6.2(2) !section 3.7.2(2) !subject More syntactical categories !reference RM9X-3.6.2(2);5.95 !reference RM9X-3.7.2(2);5.95 !from Stéphane Barbey !reference as: 95-5089.a Stephane Barbey 95-1-31>> Shouldn't the word "prefix" in the paragraph 3.6.2(2) ("The following attributes are defined for a prefix A that is of an array type ...") be a syntactical category, like (for instance) in 3.7.2(2) ? -Stephane ****************************************************************