CVS difference for ais/ai-00025.txt

--- ais/ai-00025.txt	2000/06/21 23:39:06	1.5
+++ ais/ai-00025.txt	2000/07/13 04:31:26	1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 12.05.04 (04)                               00-01-25  AI95-00025/04
+!standard 12.05.04 (04)                               00-07-12  AI95-00025/05
 !class confirmation 95-06-25
 !status Response 2000 00-01-25
 !status WG9 approved 96-12-07
@@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
 !question
 
 12.5.4(4) states that "If and only if the general_access_modifier
-constant applies to the formal, the actual shall be an access-to
-constant type".  Is it really intended to forbid an access-to-variable
+constant applies to the formal, the actual shall be an access-to-constant
+type".  Is it really intended to forbid an access-to-variable
 type from being passed as an actual to a generic formal
 access-to-constant type?  (Yes.)
 
@@ -49,8 +49,6 @@
 value designating a constant, thus allowing a constant to be modified.
 This would be very bad.  Hence, the "if and only if" wording of
 12.5.4(4).
-
-This should be explained in the AARM.
 
 !ACATS test