CVS difference for ais/ai-00004.txt

Differences between 1.3 and version 1.4
Log of other versions for file ais/ai-00004.txt

--- ais/ai-00004.txt	1999/08/31 22:53:53	1.3
+++ ais/ai-00004.txt	2000/07/13 04:31:26	1.4
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@
     for a generic formal access type;
 
 This seems to imply that a remote access type has no storage pool, which
-is confirmed by AARM-E.2.2(17.a):
+is confirmed by AARM E.2.2(17.a):
 
- 17.a   Reason:  All three of these restrictions are because there is no
-        storage pool associated with a remote access-to-class-wide type.
+    Reason:  All three of these restrictions are because there is no
+    storage pool associated with a remote access-to-class-wide type.
 
 However, E.2.2(17) allows allocators for types derived from remote
 access types.  How can an allocator work for a type that has no storage
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 !discussion
 
 Normally, a derived access type has the same storage pool as its parent.
-See AI95-00062, which confirms NOTE 3.4(31).  However, the intent of
+See 8652/0012 (AI-00062), which confirms NOTE 3.4(31).  However, the intent of
 E.2.2(17) is that a remote access type has no storage pool.  Therefore,
 a type derived from a remote access type cannot have a storage pool,
 either.  Querying 'Storage_Pool and 'Storage_Size should be illegal by

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent