!comment This file contains Corrigendum conflicts for the first Corrigendum !comment for Ada 2022. Conflicts occur when multiple issues change the same !comment paragraph of the standard. !comment This file (and the reading of it in the program) would need to !comment be changed for a new Corrigendum or Amendment. !comment The paragraphs must be in sorted order!! !comment None yet. The below shows a sample conflict. !comment !corrigendum 3.2.4(4/3) !comment !AI-0071-1 !comment !AI-0099-1 !comment @drepl !comment @xbullet !comment @dby !comment @xbullet !corrigendum 4.3.5(11/5) !AI-0021-1 !AI-0032-1 @drepl For an Aggregate aspect, the key type of Assign_Indexed shall be the same type as that of the parameters of New_Indexed. Additionally, if both Add_Unnamed and Assign_Indexed are specified, the final parameters shall be of the same type @emdash the element type of the container type. @dby For an Aggregate aspect, neither the element type nor the key type (if any) of the container type shall be a limited type. Additionally, the key type of Assign_Indexed shall be the same type as that of the parameters of New_Indexed and that type shall be a discrete type. If both Add_Unnamed and Assign_Indexed are specified, the final parameters shall be of the same type @emdash the element type of the container type. None of the subprograms specified for an Aggregate aspect shall have a formal access parameter, nor an explicitly aliased formal parameter. If the container type @i is not abstract, then none of the subprograms specified in the Aggregate aspect for @i shall be abstract. In addition to the places where Legality Rules normally apply (see 12.3), these rules apply also in the private part of an instance of a generic unit.