CVS difference for ai12s/ai12-0426-1.txt

Differences between 1.1 and version 1.2
Log of other versions for file ai12s/ai12-0426-1.txt

--- ai12s/ai12-0426-1.txt	2021/05/08 05:22:39	1.1
+++ ai12s/ai12-0426-1.txt	2021/05/24 22:55:40	1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard x.x.x(xx)                                 21-05-07  AI12-0426-1/01
+!standard 3.5.10(9)                                   21-05-22  AI12-0426-1/02
 !standard A.18.33(24/3)
 !class presentation 21-05-07
 !status Amendment 1-2012 21-05-07
@@ -17,11 +17,20 @@
 
 (1) A.18.33(24/3) "Short hand" is ususual, should it be written "shorthand"?
 
+(2) 3.5.10(9) ends with a period ('.'), but it is the second bullet of a set
+of three, and the first bullet ends with a semicolon (';'). Should it end with
+a semicolon, too? (Yes.)
+
 !recommendation
 
 (1) Certainly this should be "shorthand". The original comment also noted
 a few uses of "short-hand", we change those as well.
 
+(2) Fix it! This has been wrong since the original Ada 95 Standard. 
+Interestingly, the Ada 9x drafts 4.0 and 5.0 only have two bullets here, so
+the third bullet (3.5.10(10)) must have been a last-minute addition, and the 
+punctuation wasn't changed properly.
+
 !wording
 
 
@@ -32,11 +41,23 @@
 Also, replace "short-hand" by "shorthand" in AARM 3.8(15.a) and 
 AARM 11.1(1.c).
 
+(2) Replace the ending '.' with ';' in 3.5.10(9).
 
 !discussion
 
 (See !recommendation.)
 
+!corrigendum 3.5.10(9)
+
+@drepl
+@xbullet<For a subtype defined by a @fa<subtype_indication> without a 
+@fa<digits_constraint>, the digits of the subtype is the same as that of the 
+subtype denoted by the @fa<subtype_mark> in the @fa<subtype_indication>.>
+@dby
+@xbullet<For a subtype defined by a @fa<subtype_indication> without a 
+@fa<digits_constraint>, the digits of the subtype is the same as that of the 
+subtype denoted by the @fa<subtype_mark> in the @fa<subtype_indication>;>
+
 !corrigendum A.18.33(24/3)
 
 @drepl
@@ -58,7 +79,7 @@
 
 From the WG 9 review, Issue #125
 
-A.18.33 24/3 
+A.18.33(24/3)
 
 Shorthand is normally one word these days. By far the majority of uses of 
 shorthand in the AARM are one word. There are some instances of short-hand
@@ -66,3 +87,9 @@
 
 ****************************************************************
 
+From the WG 9 review, Issue #30
+
+3.5.10(9)
+
+The bullet should end in a ';' not a '.'.
+****************************************************************

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent