CVS difference for ai12s/ai12-0200-1.txt

Differences between 1.5 and version 1.6
Log of other versions for file ai12s/ai12-0200-1.txt

--- ai12s/ai12-0200-1.txt	2016/12/06 01:00:35	1.5
+++ ai12s/ai12-0200-1.txt	2016/12/28 04:20:39	1.6
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 !standard 13.11.4(31/3)
 !class binding interpretation 16-08-11
 !status Amendment 1-2012 16-11-09
+!status ARG Approved 10-1-1  (By Letter Ballot) 16-12-27
 !status work item 16-12-05
 !status ARG Approved 9-0-1  16-10-08
 !status work item 16-08-11
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@
 Point (1) was in fact one of the purposes of AI12-0052-1, changing the wording
 to "any language-defined subprogram" rather than "the same subprogram".
-We've simplified the wording to remove the use of the word "reenterant", as
+We've simplified the wording to remove the use of the word "reentrant", as
 that doesn't seem to add anything other than making a long paragraph longer.
 !corrigendum A(3/4)
@@ -385,5 +386,29 @@
 approved by the whole group. If such approval failed, we'd revert to the
 editorial changes only most likely (but we'd have to discuss that at a
+From: Randy Brukardt
+Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016  9:41 PM
+[A partial response to a thread filed in AI12-0196-1 - Editor.]
+> I suspect Randy will be a bit annoyed you didn't mention this issue 
+> earlier!
+I would have been, but luckily his vote doesn't matter.
+The vote was Approve (with or without changes): Baird, Barnes, Brukardt,
+Burns, Cousins, Dismukes, Ploedereder, Rosen, Taft, and Vardanega.
+Reject: Moore.
+Abstain: Duff.
+Thus we have a vote of 10-1-1. Given our new procedures, we require a majority
+of the responding members (12 here) to vote for it (that would mean at least 7
+approve votes in this case); and no more than 17% rejection votes (that's 2.04
+votes in this case). All of these are clearly met, so this vote passes.

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent