CVS difference for ai12s/ai12-0058-1.txt

--- ai12s/ai12-0058-1.txt	2013/06/11 01:01:49	1.4
+++ ai12s/ai12-0058-1.txt	2013/06/11 01:04:36	1.5
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-!standard B.5                                   13-05-20    AI12-0058-1/01
-!class Amendment 13-01-22
+!standard B.5                                   13-05-20    AI12-0058-1/02
+!class binding interpretation 13-05-20
 !status work item 13-01-22
 !status received 12-07-03
 !priority Medium
@@ -7,14 +7,20 @@
 !subject The Fortran Annex needs updating to support Fortran 2008
 !summary
 
+** Summary of actual changes.
+
+!question
+
 Annex B.5 Interfacing with Fortran
 -- is out of date and incomplete with respect to Fortran 2008,
 -- offers implementation permissions to interface with declarations that
    are not part of any Fortran standard, and
 -- offers implementation permissions based upon unsound Fortran
    programming practice.
+
+Should this be fixed? (Yes.)
 
-!problem
+!recommendation
 
 Annex B.5, describing Interfaces.Fortran, includes some inappropriate
 advice, could be more complete, and is obsolete with respect to the
@@ -366,9 +372,11 @@
 
     http://www.ada-auth.org/ais.html
 
-and then click on the version of the standard of interest, and then click on the "Ada Issues Database Index" link for that version.
+and then click on the version of the standard of interest, and then click on 
+the "Ada Issues Database Index" link for that version.
 
-Once you click on an individual AI, it will actually take you to the configuration management system.  You will generally want to choose the latest version of the AI.
+Once you click on an individual AI, it will actually take you to the configuration
+management system.  You will generally want to choose the latest version of the AI.
 
 I have attached one AI as an example.
 
@@ -405,7 +413,8 @@
 >>>> Ada Rapporteur Group (ARG) does the "real" work on the Ada
 >>>> standard.  The most useful input would be to send a more complete
 >>>> proposal to the Ada-Comment list, in terms of specific changes.  We
->>>> could then invite you to one of the ARG meetings, if that would be appropriate, to have a longer discussion of these issues.
+>>>> could then invite you to one of the ARG meetings, if that would be
+>>>> appropriate, to have a longer discussion of these issues.
 >>>
 >>> Tucker:
 >>>