CVS difference for ai12s/ai12-0025-1.txt

Differences between 1.6 and version 1.7
Log of other versions for file ai12s/ai12-0025-1.txt

--- ai12s/ai12-0025-1.txt	2015/12/18 02:06:56	1.6
+++ ai12s/ai12-0025-1.txt	2017/04/06 02:39:19	1.7
@@ -1881,7 +1881,8 @@
 > ...
 > The argument I present is that if we allowed Unchecked_Access on
 > subprograms, it would allow a programmer to express a portable
-> solution in a much less awkward manner, that could execute potentially 50-60 times faster than the current portable solution.
+> solution in a much less awkward manner, that could execute potentially 50-60
+> times faster than the current portable solution.
 
 It is not easy to implement Unchecked_Access on subprograms in many run-time
 models.  It doesn't become any easier to do so if we add it to the Ada standard.
@@ -2236,7 +2237,9 @@
 > I think Randy also made this point:  If up-level references don't
 > work, then 'Unchecked_Access is 100% useless.
 
-Right, I made that point. I also made the point that implementing up-level addresses for 'Unchecked_Access is impractical (it requires trampolines or making access incompatible with C).
+Right, I made that point. I also made the point that implementing up-level
+addresses for 'Unchecked_Access is impractical (it requires trampolines or
+making access incompatible with C).
 
 > Also note that Brad is the one requesting the feature, and his recent
 > example (see Test_Access_To_Subprogram) uses up-level references.  (If
@@ -2717,7 +2720,7 @@
 
 ****************************************************************
 
-From: Randy Brukardt
+From: Erhard Ploedereder
 Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013  11:46 AM
 
 >> If there is anything here that's "reactionary", it's worrying about

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent