CVS difference for ai12s/ai12-0002-1.txt

--- ai12s/ai12-0002-1.txt	2012/06/07 06:27:24	1.2
+++ ai12s/ai12-0002-1.txt	2012/06/07 06:28:37	1.3
@@ -810,73 +810,3 @@
 
 ****************************************************************
 
-From: Adam Beneschan
-Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012  1:09 PM
-
-!topic Small language hole involving remote access-to-classwide types
-!reference E.2.2(16)
-!from Adam Beneschan 12-05-17
-!discussion
-
-What, if anything, makes this program illegal?
-
-    with Ada.Streams;
-    package Pack1 is
-        pragma Pure;
-        type Root is tagged limited private;
-        procedure Prim (N : Integer; X : Root);
-        package Inner is   -- needed to make Do_Write non-primitive
-            procedure Do_Write
-                        (Stream : access Ada.Streams.Root_Stream_Type'Class;
-                         X : Root);
-        end Inner;
-        for Root'Write use Inner.Do_Write;
-    private
-        type Root is tagged limited record
-            F1 : Integer;
-        end record;
-    end Pack1;
-
-    with Pack1;
-    package Pack2 is
-        pragma Remote_Types;
-        type Root_Acc is access all Pack1.Root'Class;
-    end Pack2;
-
-    with Pack2;
-    package Pack3 is
-        pragma Remote_Call_Interface;
-        procedure Test1 (A : Pack2.Root_Acc);
-    end Pack3;
-
-    with Pack1;
-    with Ada.Streams;
-    package body Pack3 is
-
-        procedure Do_Write (Stream : access Ada.Streams.Root_Stream_Type'Class;
-                            The_Obj : Pack2.Root_Acc) is
-        begin
-            Pack1.Prim (4, The_Obj.all);
-            Pack1.Root'Class'Write (Stream, The_Obj.all);  -- ILLEGAL?
-        end Do_Write;
-
-        procedure Test1 (A : Pack2.Root_Acc) is
-        begin
-            ...
-        end Test1;
-
-    end Pack3;
-
-The statement marked ILLEGAL shouldn't be allowed, since it involves an access
-parameter in a remote dispatching call.  GNAT rejects the statement saying
-"invalid dereference of a remote access-to-class-wide value", apparently
-referring to E.2.2(16).  However, the language of E.2.2(16) doesn't seem to make
-this illegal, since The_Obj.all is part of a dispatching call and its value is a
-controlling operand according to the definitions in 3.9.2.  [It would have been
-good enough when E.2.2(16) was written, but the rule that made stream attributes
-dispatching operations in 3.9.2 appeared later.]  If there's nothing else that
-makes this illegal, maybe something needs to be added to E.2.2(16).  (I realize
-this is an obscure, low priority issue.)
-
-****************************************************************
-