CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0224-1.txt
--- ai05s/ai05-0224-1.txt 2011/03/11 07:33:24 1.9
+++ ai05s/ai05-0224-1.txt 2011/03/17 07:06:30 1.10
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
!standard D.7(7) 11-01-28 AI05-0224-1/02
!standard D.7(10.3/2)
!class binding interpretation 10-10-21
+!status Amendment 2012 11-03-11
+!status ARG Approved 7-0-0 10-02-20
!status work item 10-10-21
!status received 10-06-07
!priority Low
@@ -56,15 +58,21 @@
!corrigendum D.7(7)
@dinsa
+@xhang<@xterm<No_Task_Allocators>
+There are no @fa<allocator>s for task types or types containing
+task type subcomponents.>
@dinst
-In the case of an initialized @fa<allocator> of an access type whose designated type
-is class-wide and limited, a check is made that the specific type of the
-allocated object has no task subcomponents. Program_Error is raised if this
-check fails.
+@xindent<In the case of an initialized @fa<allocator> of an access type whose
+designated type is class-wide and limited, a check is made that the specific type
+of the allocated object has no task subcomponents. Program_Error is raised if this
+check fails.>
!corrigendum D.7(10.3/2)
@dinsa
+@xhang<@xterm<No_Protected_Type_Allocators>
+There are no @fa<allocator>s for protected types or types containing
+protected type subcomponents.>
@dinst
In the case of an initialized @fa<allocator> of an access type whose designated type
is class-wide and limited, a check is made that the specific type of the
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent