CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0184-1.txt
--- ai05s/ai05-0184-1.txt 2009/11/03 01:06:11 1.1
+++ ai05s/ai05-0184-1.txt 2009/11/04 06:26:38 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard A.18.17 (0) 09-11-02 AI05-0184-1/01
+!standard A.18.17 (0) 09-11-02 AI05-0184-1/02
!standard A.18.18 (0)
!standard A.18.19 (0)
!standard A.18.20 (0)
@@ -56,12 +56,14 @@
is readable by Element_Type'Input or Element_Type'Read,
respectively (where Element_Type denotes the type of
of the two actual Element_Type parameters); and
- - the preceding two conditions also hold the Index_Type
+ - the preceding two conditions also hold for the Index_Type
parameters of the instances.
-The condition which mentions the Index_Type parameters is omitted for the
-non-vector containers (which have no Index_Type parameter). In that case, the ";
-and" of the formerly penultimate condition is replaced with a period.
+The condition which mentions the Index_Type parameters is:
+ - replaced by similar wording for Key_Type parameters for map containers;
+ - omitted for list and set containers (which have no extra parameters).
+ In that case, the "; and" of the formerly penultimate condition is
+ replaced with a period.
!discussion
@@ -342,5 +344,27 @@
Stuttering here?? A strange fetish for the word "the"? ;-)
I've fixed this in the posted AI.
+
+****************************************************************
+
+From: Steve Baird
+Sent: Monday, November 2, 2009 8:00 PM
+
+>> if the the two instances meet the the following conditions
+>
+> Stuttering here?? A strange fetish for the word "the"? ;-)
+>
+> I've fixed this in the posted AI.
+>
+
+Conservation of three-letter words.
+Delete a "the" and insert a "for" into
+ "preceding two conditions also hold the Index_Type"
+
+Randy Brukardt wrote:
+> Would you not need to have similar wording for the Key_Type parameter
+> of maps?
+
+Right. Thanks for catching that.
****************************************************************
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent