CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0143-1.txt
--- ai05s/ai05-0143-1.txt 2009/07/11 03:06:22 1.3
+++ ai05s/ai05-0143-1.txt 2010/06/03 06:19:23 1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 6.01 (18) 09-06-27 AI05-0143-1/03
+!standard 6.01 (18) 10-06-02 AI05-0143-1/04
!standard 6.06 (03)
!class Amendment 09-02-15
!status Amendment 201Z 09-06-27
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
-Parameters of all modes are allowed in functions.
+Parameters of all modes are allowed for functions.
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
'Access, or to remove a dereference). They also require altering the declaration
of the object to be passed (to include "aliased"). Finally, access parameters
are more expensive at run-time than regular parameter passing, as they are
-required to include a run-tine indication of their accessibility level. The
+required to include a run-time indication of their accessibility level. The
run-time check can even be dangerous, as the check may fail only with
arguments declared in nested scopes, and that may not happen in unit testing.
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
less convenient syntax and are less efficient (because of the possibility of
dynamic accessibility checks) than "in out" parameters would be.
-As one commenter put described our current situation with incorrect order
+As one commenter described our current situation with incorrect order
dependence, we're already in a deep pit, and if we're not at the bottom
already, we're only a few centimeters above it. Thus, the problem of incorrect
order dependence is one that should be addressed irrespective of "in out"
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
to convert a function into a similar procedure call, and even when it is
possible, the result is harder to use than necessary.
-However, the presense of "in out" parameters doesn't really tell us whether
+However, the presence of "in out" parameters doesn't really tell us whether
or not we need write access to the protected object; it is perfectly reasonable
to modify a parameter but not the protected object. This imperfect description
is no better than the current situation in the eyes of some reviewers (an
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent