CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0130-1.txt

Differences between 1.3 and version 1.4
Log of other versions for file ai05s/ai05-0130-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0130-1.txt	2009/01/17 01:58:06	1.3
+++ ai05s/ai05-0130-1.txt	2009/07/11 03:06:22	1.4
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-!standard 7.6(12)                                               09-01-16  AI05-0130-1/02
+!standard 7.6(12)                                               09-06-26  AI05-0130-1/03
 !standard 7.6.1(9/2)
 !class ramification 09-01-16
+!status ARG Approved  7-0-0  09-06-13
 !status work item 08-12-04
 !status received 08-10-17
 !priority Low
@@ -111,7 +112,7 @@
 any semantic changes is false in this case. That is a possible source of bugs.
 
 But, clearly, the current rule also prevents bugs (just different bugs). In
-the absence of any reason to choice one set of bugs over another, it makes
+the absence of any reason to choose one set of bugs over another, it makes
 the most sense for the language to be consistent and use the same rules for
 all types. Thus, we do not recommend a change to this rule.
 
@@ -122,15 +123,15 @@
 extension components directly in T). But that would be complicated by this
 requirement, and could not be done at all in unusual cases.
 
-[Data point: at least some existing implementations get this wrong. There is
-clearly an implementation burden (and possible introduction of bugs) in redoing
-the compilers to get this right. Generally, we'd want an ACATS test to check
-these examples, which would encourage implementers to change. Do we want that??]
-
 !ACATS Test
 
-An ACATS C-test should be constructed to test a case like the example given here,
+An ACATS C-test could be constructed to test a case like the example given here,
 in order to verify that the rule is implemented properly.
+
+However, we believe that this is relatively low priority to make portable. There
+is clearly an implementation burden (and possible introduction of bugs) to fixing
+this. So at this time, we are recommending not creating a test until after all
+higher priority test cases are tested.
 
 !appendix
 

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent