CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt

Differences between 1.3 and version 1.4
Log of other versions for file ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt	2008/03/07 06:15:19	1.3
+++ ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt	2008/05/10 05:14:33	1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 2.1(4/2)                                            08-02-26    AI05-0079-1/02
+!standard 2.1(4/2)                                            08-04-18    AI05-0079-1/03
 !standard 2.2(7)
 !class binding interpretation 07-12-07
 !status ARG Approved  7-0-1  08-02-09
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 Add at the end of 2.1(4/2):
 
 The only characters allowed outside of comments are those in categories
-other_format, format_effector and graphic_character.
+other_format, format_effector, and graphic_character.
 
 Add a new paragraph after 2.2(7):
 
@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@
 
 @drepl
 The coded representation for characters is implementation defined
-[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003 ISO-10646-1)].
+[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003)].
 A character whose relative code position in its plane is 16#FFFE# or 16#FFFF#
 is not allowed anywhere in the text of a program. 
 @dby
 The coded representation for characters is implementation defined
-[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003 ISO-10646-1)].
+[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003)].
 A character whose relative code position in its plane is 16#FFFE# or 16#FFFF#
 is not allowed anywhere in the text of a program. 
 The only characters allowed outside of comments are those in categories
-@fa<other_format>, @fa<format_effector> and @fa<graphic_character>.
+@fa<other_format>, @fa<format_effector>, and @fa<graphic_character>.
 
 !corrigendum 2.2(7)
 
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@
 "The only characters allowed outside of comments are the
 graphic_characters and format_effectors".
 
-So I agree that a BI is needed.  II would rather phrase it in terms of
+So I agree that a BI is needed.  I would rather phrase it in terms of
 lexical elements, than in terms of separators, though.  Something like
 the following, after 2.2(7):
 

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent