CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt
--- ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt 2008/03/07 06:15:19 1.3
+++ ai05s/ai05-0079-1.txt 2008/05/10 05:14:33 1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 2.1(4/2) 08-02-26 AI05-0079-1/02
+!standard 2.1(4/2) 08-04-18 AI05-0079-1/03
!standard 2.2(7)
!class binding interpretation 07-12-07
!status ARG Approved 7-0-1 08-02-09
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
Add at the end of 2.1(4/2):
The only characters allowed outside of comments are those in categories
-other_format, format_effector and graphic_character.
+other_format, format_effector, and graphic_character.
Add a new paragraph after 2.2(7):
@@ -103,16 +103,16 @@
@drepl
The coded representation for characters is implementation defined
-[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003 ISO-10646-1)].
+[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003)].
A character whose relative code position in its plane is 16#FFFE# or 16#FFFF#
is not allowed anywhere in the text of a program.
@dby
The coded representation for characters is implementation defined
-[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003 ISO-10646-1)].
+[(it need not be a representation defined within ISO/IEC 10646:2003)].
A character whose relative code position in its plane is 16#FFFE# or 16#FFFF#
is not allowed anywhere in the text of a program.
The only characters allowed outside of comments are those in categories
-@fa<other_format>, @fa<format_effector> and @fa<graphic_character>.
+@fa<other_format>, @fa<format_effector>, and @fa<graphic_character>.
!corrigendum 2.2(7)
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@
"The only characters allowed outside of comments are the
graphic_characters and format_effectors".
-So I agree that a BI is needed. II would rather phrase it in terms of
+So I agree that a BI is needed. I would rather phrase it in terms of
lexical elements, than in terms of separators, though. Something like
the following, after 2.2(7):
Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent