CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0062-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0062-1.txt	2007/08/21 23:29:13	1.1
+++ ai05s/ai05-0062-1.txt	2007/09/13 02:20:43	1.2
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 !summary
 
 A full constant for a deferred constant that does not have a null exclusion
-may in fact has such an exclusion.
+may in fact have such an exclusion.
 
 !question
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 null_exclusion is separate from the subtype_mark, and thus matching only applies to
 that subtype_mark.
 
-What is the indent here?
+What is the intent here?
 
 !recommendation
 
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 !discussion
 
 The net effect of the current rules is that the static matching requirement of 7.4(6/2)
-makes 7.4(7.1/2) completely redundant and unnecessary. Thus, the easiet fix is to
+makes 7.4(7.1/2) completely redundant and unnecessary. Thus, the easiest fix is to
 delete 7.4(7.1/2).
 
 However, it is clear that it was intended that the explicit null_exclusions would not