CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0053-1.txt

Differences between 1.6 and version 1.7
Log of other versions for file ai05s/ai05-0053-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0053-1.txt	2008/05/22 05:23:58	1.6
+++ ai05s/ai05-0053-1.txt	2008/05/29 04:36:46	1.7
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 3.10(9/2)                                08-05-21    AI05-0053-1/06
+!standard 3.10(9/2)                                08-05-27    AI05-0053-1/06
 !standard 6.5(2.1/2)
 !class binding interpretation 07-05-15
 !status work item 08-05-21
@@ -154,10 +154,10 @@
 privacy-breaking. This was not an issue in the case of
 the current instance of a type because the current instance of
 a type can only be named in a context where the completion of the
-type is visible. With extended return statements, we we don't want
+type is visible. With extended return statements, we don't want
 to look through private types to see if the completion "has the
 reserved word *limited*". The rule is therefore expressed in terms
-of "an explicitly limited record type" instead.
+of "an immutably limited record type" instead.
 
 We could have instead explicitly stated the Unchecked_Access
 "clarification" described above and added a runtime check which

Questions? Ask the ACAA Technical Agent