CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0051-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0051-1.txt	2010/10/26 00:24:13	1.12
+++ ai05s/ai05-0051-1.txt	2010/11/17 00:13:20	1.13
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
-!standard 3.10.2(14/2)                              10-10-25    AI05-0051-1/09
+!standard 3.10.2(14/2)                              10-11-16    AI05-0051-1/10
 !standard 3.10.2(14.4/2)
 !standard 3.10.2(19/2)
 !standard 6.5(21/2)
 !standard 7.6.1(11/2)
 !standard 13.11(25.2/2)
 !class binding interpretation 07-05-04
+!status ARG Approved  5-0-2  10-11-16
 !status work item 07-05-04
 !status received 07-04-19
 !priority Medium
@@ -151,13 +152,11 @@
     level of the type determined by the subtype_indication, or by the
     tag of the value of the qualified_expression, is not deeper than
     that of the type of the allocator. If the [designated subtype]
-    {subtype determined by the subtype_indication or qualified_expression
-    (or by the tag of the value of the qualified_expression if the type
-    of the qualified_expression is class-wide)} of the allocator has one
-    or more [unconstrained] access discriminants, then a check is made
-    that the accessibility level of the anonymous access type of each
-    access discriminant is not deeper than that of the type of the
-    allocator. Program_Error is raised if either such check fails.
+    {subtype determined by the subtype_indication or qualified_expression}
+    of the allocator has one or more [unconstrained] access discriminants,
+    then a check is made that the accessibility level of the anonymous
+    access type of each access discriminant is not deeper than that of the
+    type of the allocator. Program_Error is raised if either such check fails.
 
 In 6.5(5.6/2) replace
 
@@ -3196,5 +3195,12 @@
       fails.
 
 The only change is the parenthesized "(or by the tag ...)" wording.
+
+*****************************************************************
+
+Summary of the meeting minutes for ARG meeting #42:
+
+We will revert the wording to the previous version, and then create a new
+AI (AI05-0234-1) to address the latest issue brought up by Steve.
 
 *****************************************************************