CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0041-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0041-1.txt	2008/05/10 05:14:33	1.7
+++ ai05s/ai05-0041-1.txt	2008/05/29 04:36:46	1.8
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard 3.7.1(7/2)                                          08-04-09    AI05-0041-1/07
+!standard 3.7.1(7/2)                                          08-05-15    AI05-0041-1/08
 !standard 3.3(23.9/3)
 !standard 3.3(23.10/3)
 !standard 3.10.2(26/3)
@@ -201,12 +201,12 @@
 
 Clearly, the type in the question has two views (7.3.1(4/1) explicitly states that additional
 information can be made visible for a derived type). So, the problem that 3.7.1(7/2) is
-intended to prevent is present for this type. It needs to apply.
+intended to prevent is present for this type. The 3.7.1(7/2) rule needs to apply.
 
 Defining this kind of type to be a partial view would surely work, but it would trigger a
 number of other rules (for instance, about completions, freezing, and representation clauses)
 which might be harmful. As such, doing that seems to be too dangerous to contemplate,
-especially for a Corrigendum level change.
+especially for a Corrigendum-level change.
 
 Changing 3.7.1(7/2) also requires changing the matching 4.8(6/2).