CVS difference for ai05s/ai05-0004-1.txt

--- ai05s/ai05-0004-1.txt	2008/03/07 06:15:18	1.14
+++ ai05s/ai05-0004-1.txt	2008/05/29 04:36:46	1.15
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-!standard C.7.1(17/2)                               08-02-21  AI05-0004-1/11
+!standard C.7.1(17/2)                               08-05-15  AI05-0004-1/12
 !standard 1.1.2(21)
 !standard 1.1.4(14.1/2)
 !standard 3.8(11)
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
 20) The title of Annex M has changed, so the reference to it in 1.1.2(21) should be to
 "Summary of Documentation Requirements". 
 
-21) Mod should be included in the list of attribute designators.
+21) Mod should be included in the list of attribute designators in 4.1.4(3).
 
 !question
 
@@ -161,8 +161,6 @@
 names which are reserved words. The Amendment added the Mod attribute, whose name is
 a reserved word, but it was not added to this syntax. Should this be done? (Yes.)
 
-[Other questions here.]
-
 !recommendation
 
 (See summary.)
@@ -259,8 +257,15 @@
 9) This is probably an oversight. [Editor's note: This correction was made in the Ada Europe RM
 edition; see below for why.]
 
+The marked corrections were made in the Ada Europe (printed) edition
+of the consolidated reference manual. The original versions were producing linking
+errors in the HTML versions (which link syntax terms to their definitions).
+But the error is present in the 'official' documents: the final version of the Ada 95 RM,
+Corrigendum, and Amendment; so we need to fix these 'officially'.
+
 10) This is an obvious error; Wide_Wide_Text_IO.Wide_Wide_Bounded_IO was obviously
-intended.
+intended. [Editor's note: This correction was made in the Ada Europe RM
+edition to avoid confusion. As noted above, it needs to be made 'officially'.]
 
 11) "Ada 83" is meaningless from a standards perspective; it should not be used in
 normative text. Besides, this title ("Renamings of Ada 83 Library Units") is wrong:
@@ -272,12 +277,6 @@
 explained in AARM A(4.b)), as that standard is now quite old. 
 
 12) "exponent" refers to the syntax defined in 2.4.1, and should be in the syntax font.
-
-Many of the first twelve corrections were made in the Ada Europe (printed) edition
-of the consolidated reference manual. The original versions were producing linking
-errors in the HTML versions (which link syntax terms to their definitions).
-But the error is present in the 'official' documents: the final version of the Ada 95 RM,
-Corrigendum, and Amendment; so we need to fix these 'officially'.
 
 13) It would not help to have two very similar rules that are written differently.
 10.1.1(18) is the more general rule, so we remove the less general second sentence of